When Scripture Doesn't Match the Teacher: My Wrestling with 1 Timothy 2

There's a moment in every honest Bible student's journey when you encounter a passage that stops you cold. For me, that moment came when I was deep into studying 1 Timothy 2, trying to understand what Paul really meant about women in ministry.

I'd already been wrestling with other passages that seemed to contradict what I was seeing in Paul's actual ministry practices. But 1 Timothy 2? This one felt like hitting a brick wall at full speed.

The Moment Everything Became "Dis-Equilibrating"

"You know that feeling when something throws you completely off balance? That's what happened when I read Paul's words: 'But I do not allow a woman to teach or exercise authority over a man, but to remain quiet' (1 Tim. 2:12, NASB)."

Here's what made me stop in my tracks: this didn't fit with everything else I knew about Paul. This was the same apostle who worked alongside Priscilla as she taught in Ephesus. The same Paul who celebrated women leaders throughout Romans 16. The same man who called Phoebe a "ruler of many, and of myself also."

Something wasn't adding up.

But it was the next part that really sent me reeling: "But women will be preserved through the bearing of children if they continue in faith and love and sanctity with self-restraint."

Wait. What?

When Theology Becomes Gymnastics

If we take these words at face value and try to apply them universally today, we've just completely rewritten the Gospel for half of humanity. According to this interpretation:

• Men are saved by faith in Christ alone

• Women are saved by... having children?

• Barren women are out of luck?

• Childless women can't experience salvation?

I've read commentaries across the theological spectrum trying to make sense of this passage, and honestly, they tie themselves in knots attempting to explain it away. When you're doing theological gymnastics to make a passage fit your predetermined framework, that's usually a sign you're on the wrong path.

We know this can't be the Gospel. Paul was the greatest advocate of salvation by faith alone. He wouldn't suddenly change the rules for women in one letter to Timothy.

The Question That Changes Everything

So if Paul isn't establishing universal rules about women's silence and salvation through childbearing, what is he doing?

This is where I had to step back and ask: What was happening in Ephesus that would prompt Paul to address these specific issues in this specific way?

Because here's what I was learning: when Scripture seems to contradict itself, the problem usually isn't with Scripture—it's with our understanding of the context.

The Cultural Context We've Been Missing

Ephesus wasn't just any city. It was home to one of the seven wonders of the ancient world—the massive temple of Artemis (also called Diana). This wasn't just a religious site; it was the economic and cultural center of the city.

And the worship of Artemis was led by women who dominated men.

In the Artemis temple, the normal power structures were flipped. Women were in complete control, and men were expected to submit—even to the point of only raising their hands halfway during worship as a sign of submission to the female leaders.

Suddenly, Paul's seemingly random instruction for men to "lift up holy hands without wrath and dissension" starts making sense. He's telling them: "Lift your hands all the way up—but to worship the one true God, not in the power struggles you're used to."

The Real Heart of the Matter

The more I studied the cultural context, the more I realized that Paul wasn't trying to silence women or create a hierarchy. He was addressing specific problems in a specific place at a specific time.

Paul was actually fighting for something revolutionary: relationships built on mutual submission rather than dominance by either gender. He didn't want the Ephesian churches to simply flip the script from male dominance to female dominance. He wanted them to discover an entirely different way—the Kingdom way.

Wrestling Leads to Freedom

I'll be honest—questioning interpretations I'd accepted my whole life wasn't easy. It felt threatening at first. But what I discovered was liberating rather than destructive.

When we let Scripture speak within its proper context instead of forcing it into our preconceived frameworks, it reveals something far more beautiful than what we'd been taught. It shows us a God who values both men and women equally, who gifts both for leadership and service, and who calls both to mutual submission in love.

That brick wall I hit? It turned out to be the entrance to a much larger room.

The journey of honest biblical interpretation isn't always comfortable, but it's always worth it. Because when we're willing to wrestle with difficult passages instead of just accepting traditional explanations, we often discover that the God revealed in Scripture is far more loving, just, and liberating than we ever imagined.

And that's a truth worth fighting for.

This is part of my ongoing journey of discovering what Scripture really teaches about relationships, authority, and the Kingdom of God. If you're wrestling with these questions too, you're not alone. Keep digging, keep asking questions, and trust that God will guide you into all truth.

Blessings,
Susan 😊